Investopedia defines the law of diminishing returns as, “a theory in
  economics that predicts after some optimal level of capacity is
  reached, adding an additional factor of production will result in
  smaller increases in output”. For example, a business can grow its
  sales by adding employees to a certain point, at which time, hiring
  additional employees does little (or nothing) to increase sales. This
  week’s chart segments the Canadian economy into sectors, highlighting
  ‘Goods’ sectors in red, while ‘Services’ sectors are highlighted in
  blue. The bars represent the change in productivity per employee from
  the third quarter of 2022 to the first quarter of this year. Notice
  all but two sectors (Transportation & Warehousing and Retail
  Trade) have shown a negative change in production per employee over
  that time frame. In other words, 15 of the 17 sectors of the Canadian
  economy are exhibiting the law of diminishing returns as it pertains
  to employees – additional employees are adding less to production /
  sales. This isn’t good and typically occurs as an economy crests. As
  the economy grows, businesses add more employees to help grow
  production /sales. However, at some point, the business reaches an
  optimal level of employees which means that for each additional
  employee hired, the company’s sales will increase by a decreasing
  amount (or not at all).
 This employment statistic can be viewed as a leading indicator of
  future job creation or losses. Logically, if production gains per
  employee are positive as they are in the two sectors at the top of the
  chart, businesses in those sectors (Transportation & Warehousing
  and Retail Trade) have an incentive to hire more people. Conversely,
  businesses in the other 15 sectors of the economy have less incentive
  to hire because recent additions to their workforce haven’t
  meaningfully increased sales. Furthermore, businesses which are
  experiencing the law of diminishing returns for employees are likely
  to be the first to reduce their workforce if they experience a decline
  in sales (i.e. firing people may reduce costs more than it reduces sales).
 What are your thoughts? I’d love to hear from local business owners
  on this subject – are you experiencing diminishing returns in your
  workforce, or do you see the potential to increase production per
  employee? Does the chart which shows trends at a national level ‘ring
  true’ to what you’re experiencing at a local level?
 
  
    Eric Van Enk, Wealth Advisor & Portfolio Manager
 
  
    National Bank Financial – Wealth Management
 
  
    Medicine Hat, AB