Just the facts

Risky Business

July 18, 2024

I’m fortunate that from my seat I get to chat with a lot of investors across a wide variety of demographics. One of the most interesting things that comes up in every conversation is how different generations view and define their relationship with “risk”.

First off, how do you define risk?

Popular definitions in investing include: “permanent loss (or impairment) of capital”, “volatility” and “missing out”. You can likely guess which personality types, generation or stage of life uses the definitions provided above.

Whatever definition you use, it will certainly be linked to your first experience with investing (or reading investing news) and it will stay with you throughout your entire life. Now is a good time to preface that lumping groups of folks together based on something as arbitrary as the year they were born is never going to be a perfect science and there is plenty of room for error here. However, it’s always been an angle I find interesting to consider.

There’s an old saying that generals always fight the last war. It makes sense as recency bias is a natural human tendency to expect what comes next to be a continuation of what is currently being experienced.

For instance, consider at the below chart. Close your eyes and try to reimagine what was going on in the world in Mid-March 2020, the fall of 2007-March 2009, or Y2K. “The world was ending” happened more than a few times. Yet when all hope was seemingly lost, things got less bad, then continued to improve further until eventually they returned into a full blown bull market (thus restarting the cycle).

Source: MFS. Market Declines: A History of Recoveries. As of December 31st 2023.

My own personal definition of risk is: “ a permanent loss of purchasing power”.

This is a subtle variation of the above but maintains the spirit of Einstein’s “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler”. The textbook definition of purchasing power measures your returns after subtracting the impact of inflation. This is such a useful definition as inflation has been a largely dormant force since the early 1990s which encapsulates my lifetime. I also expand my definition a bit to include tax and other potentially hidden costs (such as management fees).

The origin of this note comes from just how fascinating it is to see the 2 extreme camps when it comes to risk. On the one extreme are (typically younger) investors where there is no stock or asset class too risky. Meme stocks, crypto and anything you can trade with tips from Reddit are all very much on the table. These investors have seen people online and likely people in their own social circles make money trading in these “high risk, high reward” situations. My own experience is a lot of Gen Z falls into this camp.

The other extreme is those unwilling to get off the sidelines and invest. Even purchasing a fully guaranteed money market fund is a slow process that takes time for them to get comfortable with. Many Millennials have mental scars from watching their parents suffer through the Global Financial Crisis. To them just because a bank (even a large one) is in business today is no guarantee it'll be around tomorrow.

So how to bridge the gap and get both different camps into the game in a sustainable way?

For the “risk on” group, a chat on the secret to success from motor racing legend Sir Stirling Moss “to finish first, you must first finish”. Another concepts that come to mind is Taleb’s concept of Alternative Histories.

“One can illustrate the strange concept of alternative histories as follows. Imagine an eccentric (and bored) tycoon offering you $10 million to play Russian roulette, i.e., to put a revolver containing one bullet in the six available chambers to your head and pull the trigger. Each realization would count as one history, for a total of six possible histories of equal probabilities. Five out of these six histories would lead to enrichment; one would lead to a statistic, that is, an obituary with an embarrassing (but certainly original) cause of death. The problem is that only one of the histories is observed in reality; and the winner of $10 million would elicit the admiration and praise of some fatuous journalist (the very same ones who unconditionally admire the Forbes 500 billionaires).”

For this group, it’s important to understand and fully appreciate that when the storm comes (and it always comes) you need to live to fight another day. This rules out leverage and involves discussions on position sizing and entry/exit strategies, such as setting exact price limits to either trigger a further conversation or an exit of the position. These rules need to be set well ahead of time when everyone is operating with a cooler head and strong emotions are largely kept in check.

CIO Office Five-year market expectations. As of March 29, 2024.

For the “risk off” group, a simple illustration of your “real return” as stated above usually does the trick. Loss of purchasing power via inflation is a particularly nasty thing as it’s seemingly invisible. Think of it as carbon monoxide for your portfolio, left undetected too long and the results are disastrous. For example, let’s look at the investor who locked into a money market fund because it’s guaranteed.

Past 5 years (red dots): +2.0% Return - 3.9% Inflation = -1.9% loss in purchasing power.

As of March 29, 2024. CIO Office Five-year market expectations – Main asset classes overview CIO Office (Data via Refinitiv). 1. With the exception of MSCI indices, which are in USD. 2. The area between the 25th and 75th percentile of realized return outcomes. In other words, 50% of all observations fall within this range. 3. The forecast margin of error is based on the back-tested predictive power of our return model and the historical volatility of the asset. 4. Balanced portfolio: 21% S&P/TSX, 21% S&P 500, 12% MSCI EAFE, 6% MSCI Emerging Markets and 40% Canada Bond Universe, all in CAD.

While this investor didn’t “lose money” on paper, their loss in purchasing power means they’ve still fallen behind. Also important to keep in mind is that for many common financial goals the inflation rate or price appreciation was considerably higher than the aggregate one used above (ex. all in costs of home ownership over the last 5 years rose at a rate dramatically higher than +1.9%).

While only projections, the rate on Cash of +3.6% and inflation of +1.9% means a pre-tax return (remember interest has the least favourable tax treatment) of +1.6% for the money market investor. Hardly the sort of return that will get you where you want to go (using the Rule of 72, it would take you 45 years to double your money).

When framed in these terms the message tends to get through and an understanding of, while going into stock and bond markets is risky, that’s where you need to be if you want to see your assets grow at a meaningful rate above inflation, thereby increasing your purchasing power over time.

CIO Office (data via Refinitiv). *35% S&P 500, 35% S&P/TSX, 20% MSCI EAFE, 10% MSCI EM; all in CAD.

**60% Equities, 40% Fixed Income ***100% ICE BofA Broad Canada Universe.

What this really boils down to knowing yourself, your formative investment experiences and what your large financial fears are. Working with professionals, such as those on the Fairway team, will help you to overcome those fears and dramatically increase your odds of meeting your financial goals in both the short and long term.

1. National Bank Financial - Wealth Management (NBFWM) is a division of National Bank Financial Inc. (NBF), as well as a trademark owned by National Bank of Canada (NBC) that is used under license by NBF. NBF is a member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) and the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (CIPF), and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NBC, a public company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: NA).

2. The information contained herein was obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete. The opinions expressed are based on our analysis and interpretation of this information and are not to be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned herein. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of National Bank Financial.

3. The securities or investment sectors mentioned herein are not suitable for all types of investors. Please consult your investment advisor to verify whether the securities or sectors suit your investor's profile as well as to obtain complete information, including the main risk factors, regarding those securities or sectors. This document is not a research analysis produced by the Research Department of National Bank Financial.

4.  Insurance products and services are provided by National Bank Insurance Firm (NBIF). NBIF is not a member of the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (CIPF).  Insurance products are not protected by CIPF.  Please note that comments included in this newsletter are for information purposes only and are not intended to provide legal, tax or accounting advice.

5. Insurance products and services are provided by NBF Financial Services (NBFFS). NBFFS is not a Member of the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (CIPF). Insurance products are not protected by the CIPF.

6. NBF is not a tax advisor and clients should seek professional advice on tax-related matters, including their personal situation. Please note that comments included in this letter are for information purposes only and are not intended to provide legal, tax or accounting advice. The comments reflect the opinion of their author only and may not reflect the views of NBF.

Contact us

Get contact information for our team members and find out where our offices are.