Hello, this is Simon Doran coming to you live and direct from the National Bank Tower in downtown Vancouver on a snowy Tuesday, February 4th. I thought this was timely to come up with a little bit of a commentary on recent headlines over the weekend. Of course, we saw many headlines concerning the tariffs that were about to be implemented by the US against Canada and Mexico. Those were subsequently, of course, deferred for 30 days. But before we get into that, I'd like to sort of dial it back to how we got here.
So in November, of course, we had a new US Administration elected. Donald Trump is now your president. At the time, we put out a commentary, and we were actually quite constructive on it. We think overall he will be a positive thing for the investment landscape, primarily based on a reduction of bureaucracy and red tape and just sort of greasing the wheels of business, reducing taxes, etc. So we think that that's laying the groundwork for an excellent investment landscape. Now he also has alignment, of course, in the House and the Senate, so this actually does clear the way for him to make significant change. And as the saying goes, if you want change, move fast and break things. That's sort of the mantra that a lot of business people go by. And the basic premise is that you can extend boundaries and make real change in a relatively short period of time.
Now that's what we've seen. We've seen all kinds of headlines coming out of the US almost on the daily about executive orders and all these things that are going to impact us negatively. We still maintain that this is a positive environment for investments. We think that Trump has surrounded himself with some excellent business minds, and that hopefully will allow logic and rational decisions to prevail. The reality is, though, that it is wrapped in a Trump wrapper, so we are going to get a lot of scary headlines, bombastic statements, all the rest.
Now when it comes to this most recent tariff threat, I think that we had assigned a fairly high probability to the fact that they would be delayed. So we're glad that obviously came to fruition. We're not really certain that these tariffs make any sense at all for the US to implement. We think that it's more harmful to them than otherwise. So if you take, for example, our trade or their trade deficit with Canada, if you take oil out of the equation, they actually have a trade surplus with us. And the oil that we send to them, of course, is a very profitable investment for them. They refine it; they're actually net exporters of oil to the rest of the world. So I don't really see a lot of reason for them to disrupt the apple cart there.
Furthermore, they do complain often, or the Trump Administration has complained often, about their deficit with the world in terms of trade. However, Canada represents 2 to 3% of their total deficit, and obviously being close geographical countries, I think that it makes more sense for them again not to disturb the apple cart with us. So we're happy to see that. We do think, however, that they will hold this over our heads, as they will with Mexico. It will be something that will be sort of held in perpetuity in order to get various concessions on other issues. So we are concerned about that. If they were to actually implement the tariffs, our analysis says that we would suffer, obviously, a pretty serious recession as a result. But again, we don't think that that is likely.
In terms of us as portfolio managers and how we're approaching this, in any circumstance, part of our job as portfolio managers is to determine what the possible outcomes of an investment would be. We assign a probability to those events, and then we layer on a performance expectation to each event. And that's how we sort of make our investment decisions, right? We come back to the table, and we decide whether it's a yes or a no based on our risk-adjusted assessment.
So we do think that overall, again, the landscape for investments remains good. And when you look at our portfolios right now, we're very defensively positioned. We have generally lower than the average conservative balance growth portfolio assigned to equities. In the equity component, we have almost half of our exposure in the US to US companies, so they would be, of course, somewhat insulated against tariffs against Canada. In addition, the Canadian companies that we do have in our equity portfolio are predominantly US and international in terms of where they sort of garner their revenue from. So I think that they should be relatively well insulated as well.
We also have exposure to small and midcap companies, which would actually benefit in a dramatic sort of trade war for the US. And I guess when we turn to the fixed income department, our positioning there is very short-term and high quality, so I don't think we're really exposed to any shocks there. The third element of our portfolios is alternatives, and in that category, it really shouldn't matter what direction equity or bond markets take. So I think overall we're very well positioned. And since the Trump election in November, we're actually positive in our portfolios and all our models.
So I guess this is just to say that we'd like you to stay focused on the long term for this. Our view is that 2025 is probably going to be full of headlines and probably a little bit more volatile, but we still think within that there's the ability to make good money. Beyond 2025, we think that the groundwork right now is being set for a very positive investment environment. So in the meantime, we'll continue to put politics aside. We try to just remain focused on the investment lens in the pursuit of excellent risk-adjusted returns.
So that's my only quick message for you today. If you have any further questions, of course, never hesitate to call us, and we'll fill you in on all the details. Thank you.