Your resources

 Providing unique insights 

Keeping you updated on the financial industry

Browse our newsletter and education tools to keep up with the current economic news and gain advice on your financial health.

Seasonal Newsletter

Keep up to date with news from Copper Creek Wealth Management.

Read the latest edition

Insights and Tools

Economic Impact

In order to help keep you informed and stimulate your thinking with regards to the current financial context, Stéfane Marion and Denis Girouard take a look at economic news and share their perspectives via our monthly informative videos.

Hello everyone, Welcome to Economic Impact. Today is December 10th, 2024 and as usual I am with our Chief Economist, Stefane Marion. Stefane, once again stock market is going up.

Hi, good morning, Denis. It's been a great wealth effect for most households. We know that most portfolios are composed of equities new all-time high on the MSI all country index. So, yeah, it's striking how well the stock market is doing globally.

And is it worldwide or it's only North America phenomenon?

Well, you might not suspect this thing, but if I was to tell you who's what's the best stock market perform where? Where's the country, where the stock markets performing the best so far in Q4?

I saw the slide.

Yeah. OK.

So Canada we're up almost 8% quarter to date, outperforming the rest of the world. Year to date, we have a 24% gain exceeded only by the US at 28%. I can bet you that not many people thought Canada would follow the US as well as it has in 2024.

Stefane, are we catching up in Canada versus the US because our price earning ratio are lower?

Yeah, we spoke to that a few quarters ago saying that it was abnormal to see this discount on Canada versus US on the stock market perspective. So you're absolutely right that there's a catch up phase here. Half of the gains on the S&P TSX this year were accounted by P/E expansion. Yet Denis, despite this catch up, we're still trading at historical discount to the US. So if I was to qualify the Canadian stock market right now, I would not call it overvalued. It's fairly valued, not overvalued for the US it's probably a different connotation.

OK. And now if we go back to economy, the exportation, I think we need to talk about that.

Well, people thought that stock market would be under pressure this quarter because of the potential threats of tariff coming from the US. I know the president-elect spoke to 25%. 25% would be a massive deal on Canada, Denis. Because we have $600 billion of exports going to the US, that's 20% of GDP. So I mean, you know, putting these slapping 25% tariffs on that would seriously fragilized any economy and probably the stock market.

And we can talk about crude oil because people, I don't think they know how much exportation we're doing to the State.

So the reason the market is not buying into the 25% tariff structure is because they know full well that the president-elect has promised the Americans that they would get affordable energy going forward. So if you impose a 25% tariff on Canada, which accounts for 62% of US imports of crude oil, we are now shipping 4 million barrels a day to the US right now. You would certainly ignite inflationary pressures in the US. So that's why the, you know, the components of the Canadian stock market that's performing so well in Q4, aside from the IT sector is the energy sector because the market is saying no, no, no, there's no way Washington could put 25% of tariff without fragilized its own economy.

OK, Stefane, but there's something doesn't add up here, why the Canadian dollar is so low compared to the US dollar despite that.

Well, for some people it's a conundrum because the models are broken because normally you have an historical relationship between the Canadian dollar and the price of oil. We also include, you know, interest rate spreads on that one. So what is striking this time is that the Canadian dollar is so cheap... well, you know, 1.40$ more than 1.40$ versus U.S. dollar and oil is trading at $70.00. We've never seen this combination in the past whenever the Canadian dollar traded at current levels, oil was trading at no more than $30.00. So obviously it's a revenue boon for the energy producers, but from a purchasing power it's quite frustrating. So a lot of people are saying why is the relationship broken between oil prices and the exchange rate?

OK, but how are you explaining that? Is it because of the employment?

Interest rate spread. So economic performance, the relative economic performance in Canada vs US. We're not doing very well right now. The unemployment rate at 6.8% last month versus US at 4.2%. So the markets have jumped on this and they are now saying that we can justify the divergence in monetary policy between the two countries.

OK, what's your call on the next Bank of Canada rate cut or not?

Well, the market is calling 90% odds that they'll be cutting rates 50 points. Yeah, 50 basis points. So we gotta get closer to 3% as quickly as possible. Denis, I want to bring your attention to the fact that this gap in the unemployment rate is the widest we've seen since 2001, so over 20 years. So yes, you can justify this. And so the Canadian dollar is trading on rate differential between Canada and US as opposed to oil prices.

Well, it's the end of the year and now we need to look at 2025. How does it look?

More uncertainty Denis. So uncertainty can bring positive surprises, but also can be challenging for markets or the economy. The reality, if we look at economic policy uncertainty in US right now, it has surged. The president-elect is not yet sitting in the White House and there's a whole bunch of policies that been rolled out there. We know that there might be a tariff war between China and the US, not just Canada and Mexico. So we're reinventing the global supply chain. It's uncertain what it means to inflation and expectations down the road. The president wants to avoid inflation expectations to rise. But this is pretty acute in terms of policy uncertainty right now. And this is a fairly high level, even if you compare to 2016 when he was first elected.

Well, we've never seen. Outside COVID, you have to go back to 2012 where it was the debt crisis in Eurozone, US was downgraded back then also, don't forget that... And there was also the beginning of a war in Syria, which is reigniting again. So we'll see what happened.

Syria is back again.

Yeah. So that can bring more challenges for markets. So again, this is not everything is so calm looking into 2025.

And we had two really spectacular year in terms of performance.

Yeah. So the message is don't be greedy when we've had two exceptional years of market returns, doesn't matter which asset classes, 2024 is just as good as 2023. It's exceptional to see back-to-back years like that. So again, looking into 2025, there are still uncertainties. So just be comfortable with your current asset mix and whether it respects your investment horizon. If not, then just give you know the calls that need to be made. But again, I can't promise you a third year of exceptional returns given the uncertainty that we see out there.

Well, on that, Stefane, thank you very much. Thank you for all of you to participate and to listen to our monthly Economic Impact. On behalf of the technical team of Economic Impact, on behalf of Stefane and myself, we wish you a happy holidays and hopefully we'll see you back in 2025.

Hello everyone, welcome to Economic Impact. Today is November 20th, 2024, and as usual I am with our chief economist Stéfane Marion. Stéfane, we had an election in United States.

Yeah, it's been a shock for many people, many sectors, but for financial markets, Denis, I have to tell you it's been positive so far. And as you look at the year so far, year to date, we're looking at positive returns for every asset class. And you know what? Despite the fact that the stock market has done particularly well this year in the US, Canada too and last year, investors now believe that next year could be yet another banner year.

Wow! Can we say the same thing for across the world? Is it the same situation? Are we seeing the same results?

No breadth is not that great Denis when you when you think about it because the reality is that—there's a lot of numbers on this slide, but bear with me—if it's green, these markets reach a new all time high in November. There's only three markets in the world that did that, the US, Canada and Hungary. So not everyone wins in this new political or geopolitical environment.

And since the election of Mr. Trump, price earning are still at the top, at the highest.

Well, the reason the US is as high as it is right now, it's been driven by multiple expansions. So forward P ratios are now trading at 23 times forward earnings. Denis, if you look prior to the COVID pandemic, when earnings normally surged during a recession, you have to go back to 1999 to see earnings or price the valuation on the stock market as high as what we have right now. And, and notice that the valuation on U.S. stock market is 35% higher than it was when Mr. Trump first won his election in 2016. So there's a lot of good growth expectations already built in the current valuations.

And at the same time, we're observing shift into yield curve, major shift in the yield curve.

This is where I'll need you to help me because you used to be a fixed income specialist and you still are, but you are actively involved in terms of trading. So what we're seeing right now, what's helping fuel the rally in financial markets is the fact that the yield curve, which had been inverted for two years. And remember, you and I exchanged a lot of times on that saying an inverted yield curve is not a good sign for the economy. Well, guess what? The inversion has disappeared. And now people are saying, wow, if the yield curve inversion has disappeared, therefore the economy can only do better in the months ahead.

Yeah. What's quite interesting that we're seeing a yield curve, you know, shifting upward while we're seeing rates going down, and we don't see that very often in the cycle.

No. So it's a yield curve. You know, it's a steepening, but it's a bear steepener.

That's getting complicated.

It's complicated, but it's most important. Because if you calibrate your model on just the shape of the yield curve, you say, OK, it's steepening, it's good for the economy is one thing. But what's happening right now, it's steepening, but I can't calibrate a model for something I've never seen. So what I'm trying to say here is that yes, rates are coming down at the short end of the curve. The feds already reduced the Fed funds rate by 75 basis points. But long-term rates, 10 year treasury yields, are up 79 basis points. So this type of bear steepener, Denis, has not been observed in over 30 years. Since the Fed started targeting the Fed funds rate, this is the first time it happens when the Fed starts cutting rates. So most unusual.

But what's kind of weird also is that the government, U.S. government are going for, you know, probably one of the biggest deficits ever and we're seeing the yield curve going down. In fact, shifting U and treasury Fed fund going down, that's weird.

There's a malaise here that seems to be explained by the fact that the 10 year treasury yield is moving higher because people are concerned now because with the level of government debt in US. So unless the US is able to significantly reduce its spending, what we're looking at for the next few years is that the US debt to GDP ratio will exceed the previous high, which was reached after... well at the end of World War 2 when the US was financing a global war. So we are in unchartered territory. Hence the movement of the yield curve that is most uncanny.

Despite all of that P/E are high, yield curve is shifting up, Fed funds are going down. People are still expecting good results or good performance for the coming year. So people are looking at the yield curve with not necessarily the same amount of details that we should speak to, you know, is it a bear or bull steepener? So you're absolutely right. What's driving the market right now? It's a steepening of the yield curve, as simple as that. And yes, every region of the world is expected to benefit from the new economic policies that will be unveiled by Washington in the quarters ahead. So anyway, Denis, when you look at this, every region of the world is expected to be up next year. So I'm not sure everyone wins in a new political or geopolitical environment, but these are the expectations as we speak.

There's a lot of positive on the market right now.

There's a lot of positive on the market right now.

There's a lot of good news already priced in the market.

But the bond market is getting a little bit more suspicious.

OK, let's come back to Canada and talk about the, you know, what's going on in our own country in terms of unemployment.

So I'm going to tell you why we have a weak currency, right? So the reality is we have a big divergence in terms of economic performance with the unemployment rate for people age 25 to 54, which is your biggest consumer base if you want, at over 5.5% in Canada, whereas the US it's at closer to 3.5%. So this massive divergence, Denis, brings that if the economy is not performing, obviously monetary policy can diverge between the two countries.

Yeah, that does mean lower Canadian rate but lower Canadian dollar.

So the way your forecast models work, when you do your currency forecasts, if you have an historical, it's a near historical spread. Well, I won't say historical, but the highest since 1997. This divergence between monetary policy between two countries is likely to be sustained for longer because of the behavior of the unemployment rate which brings about a cheaper currency. So we're at 1.41 to buy U.S. dollar. Well, we might have to pay 1.45 in the months ahead according to our model if those interest rate differentials prevail for a little bit longer, which I believe they will just because of where the economy is relative to the US. So a lot of moving parts Denis.

Well, you have a lot to say today, OK, What kind of conclusion we can come with?

Well, the conclusion is it's even difficult to know precisely with precision where you are in the cycle because the US keeps on pushing more fiscal stimulus despite the fact that the unemployment rate is low. And with the yield curve that is starting to steepen right now and in bear steepener mode, we will see what happens in the months ahead, particularly that the stock market is not cheap in the US. So if long term rates move higher because people are concerned about fiscal policy, that might be an issue. Denis, I would also say, you know, not everyone will win in the new economic regime, but the market seems to be positioned that everyone wins. So I'm a little bit more skeptical on that one. I know that people are—there's a lot of hype that AI could boost productivity and that's fine by me, I have no issues with that. But down the road, we have to be, you have to be consistent with economic theory. If I want to do more AI, more robotics, I need more electricity and electricity costs are becoming a concern at this point in time. So by at large, Denis, it's a structural change. The selection will bring about structural change. Deregulation, tax cuts will be good for corporate earnings. But there are other concerns, particularly what happens with this steepening of the yield curve. So the message here today. So let's just be prepared to live with market fluctuations in a month ahead. There will be volatility, the market will find a direction. But I'm not sure that it's a one way bet that everything goes up next year.

And once again, let's be careful.

Absolutely.

Well, thank you, Stéfane, for being with us today. Hopefully, it's gonna help you in your investment, you know, assets and everything, portfolio management. We'll see you in December. Thank you for being with us.

Investing guide

This reference guide contains a wealth of practical information and tools to help you plan your projects. Download it to your desktop to enjoy all the features. View the guide

Frequently Asked Questions

Most of us know the legal concept that the person holding a general power of attorney (the attorney) can do whatever the person who granted the power of attorney (the principal) can do legally on behalf of the principal, except making, revising, or revoking a will.  This is a truth.  However, it can be misleading. Often people think that if they have given someone a power of attorney, that person can also make decisions on behalf of their operating or holding companies in their place and stead as a director of those companies.  This is an incorrect belief and can leave your company without a person to run it when you are incapacitated and unable to run your company.

The person to whom you have granted a power of attorney can manage your personal legal and financial matters, but that person cannot act on behalf of any companies you own.  That person also cannot take your place and stead as a director of a company. There are several ways to do incapacity planning involving a company. 

The Business Corporation Act of B.C. provides that any company created under the laws of B.C., can in writing designate a person (who could be an individual or a company) as its attorney and empower that attorney either generally or for specific matters, to execute deeds, instruments, or other records on behalf of the corporation.  This is usually done by corporate resolution. 

The Power of Attorney Act of B.C. provides that a B.C. company may, by instrument in writing under its corporate seal, empower a person (who could be an individual or a company), for a specified matter or purpose, as its attorney, to execute all deeds or documents on its behalf. This is usually done by way of a power of attorney limited to a certain purpose (not general) under the corporate seal.

There are several methods of incapacity planning if you are a director of a company. The method I favoured when I was in private practice was to create companies, the Articles of which allowed the appointment of a substitute director.  I would then prepare the necessary corporate resolutions and documents to allow the company to remove the incapacitated director upon the director’s incapacity and install the substitute director. Your client’s lawyer will have his or her own method.

As investment advisors and portfolio managers, you don’t need to spend time on the legal nuances of incapacity planning involving companies.  What you need to know is that a power of attorney is not the appropriate tool for incapacity planning for an individual when it comes to the affairs of a company.  You need to know that your clients must consult either with me as the NBF estate planner in B.C. or consult a lawyer who understands incapacity planning involving businesses and companies to put in place the proper incapacity plan involving your clients’ companies.

Probate is a legal process under which a court validates a will. Obtaining probate serves several practical and legal purposes from the point of view of the executor. It enables the executor to deal with real estate on behalf of the estate. It provides banks and other institutions with confirmation of the executor’s authority to deal with the deceased’s assets. As well, it starts the clock on a statutory limitation period within which persons who wish to challenge the will must initiate an action.

There are many instances where a grant of probate may be required before the executor will be able to deal with the deceased’s assets. For example, the Land Title & Survey Authority of British Columbia will not register a transfer of the deceased’s land until after the grant of probate has been obtained. Most financial institutions will freeze the deceased’s bank accounts upon learning of the death. These accounts will remain frozen until after a grant of probate has been obtained.

Most executors are alerted to the probate requirements after they approach the deceased’s bank to try and gain access to the deceased’s bank accounts. As noted above, after a person dies their accounts are usually frozen by the bank. Generally, the bank will not unfreeze the deceased’s bank accounts without first seeing a grant of probate. This is because the bank wants to know that the will appointing the executor is valid.

If a person dies owning real estate, obtaining a grant of probate is mandatory before the executor can transfer the property to a beneficiary or sell it to a third party. These are the rules under the Land Title Act of British Columbia, and generally there are no exceptions.

An executor might also obtain a grant of probate in order to initiate the statutory limitation period under WESA, within which eligible persons who wish to challenge the will must initiate an action. This 180-day limitation period starts at the time a grant of probate is issued and applies only where a grant has been obtained. If a grant of probate is not obtained, the 180-day limitation period does not apply. In this circumstance, normal statutory limitation periods would apply (the basic statutory limitation period in British Columbia is 2 years from the date of discovery of the claim).

 As a result, most wills in BC are probated. As well, some wills are probated even where no probate fees would be payable (under the Probate Fee Act, no probate fees are payable if the value of the estate does not exceed $25,000). Obtaining a grant of probate can offer additional protections to an executor over not obtaining probate. Since being an executor is a substantial and often difficult role that carries with it personal liability of the executor, it is almost always a good idea to consider probating a will.

Probate fees are set by the Probate Fee Act of British Columbia. They are payable to the British Columbia Minister of Finance. The probate fee calculation is based on the gross value of the estate as at the date of death. “Value of the estate” is a defined term in the Probate Fee Act. Although the precise rules can be nuanced, broadly speaking probate fees are payable on the gross value (not the net value) of all of the deceased’s real estate and personal property situated in British Columbia, and on all of their intangible personal property (e.g. bank accounts) wherever located.

The current practice of probate registries in British Columbia is to allow for a deduction from the gross value of the estate the value of any mortgage registered against real property at the time of death. However, unsecured debts (such as unsecured lines of credit and credit card debt) cannot be deducted against the gross value of the estate.

The basic calculation for probate fees is a lock-step formula based on the gross value of the estate as follows:

•  no fee for the value of the estate between $0 and $25,000;

•  $6 per $1,000 or part of $1,000 for the value of the estate between $25,000 and $50,000; and

•  $14 per $1,000 or part of $1,000 for the value of the estate above $50,000.

In practice, the probate registry will confirm the precise probate fee payable based on the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Distribution submitted as part of the probate application.

The timing of your annual savings investment will make a difference in the long run, but it is far from being the critical factor many seem to believe.

Case in point: consider an investor blessed with the power of perfect market timing (blue line) compared to another investor cursed with systematically picking the worst possible day to invest each year, over 30 years (red line). In the end, the market timing champion would have outperformed the most unfortunate of all investors by a mild 1.1%/year. If we take the more realistic example of an investor saving systematically at the beginning of each month, this annual outperformance shrinks below 1%.

How is such a small gap possible? Simply because in the long run, the first year's return is superfluous. What truly matters is the frequency of savings and passage of time, not market timing.

No. Selling in times of heightened uncertainty is generally the best way to ensure heavy losses, as it often rhymes with selling low and missing the rebound.

More importantly, one should keep in mind that the only certainty is that there will always be uncertainty, as it is the price to pay for capital appreciation in the long run.

And –need we add –it isn’t in the media’s best interest to report the latest news with nuance and historical perspective; better to let fear and pessimism easily set in. However, the chart on the right should act as a reminder that letting emotions take over is a good recipe for short-term gain, but long-term pain.

Quite the contrary, it is likely that investors will only rarely see a calendar year where equity returns are close to their long-term historical averages.

Case in point: since 1957, only 8 years out of 63 have seen the Canadian stock market generate performance near average (+/-2%).

One likely reason for this myth is the common misconception that “average” is synonymous with “typical.”

However, there is no such thing as a “typical” year in the stock market.

As a result, investors should expect a wide range of possible outcomes in any given year, whereas only the passage of time can lead to an annualized return near the market’s long-term average.

It is true that daily market fluctuations resemble a coin toss. Nevertheless, two fundamental reasons make investing completely different from gambling.

First, unlike the world of gambling, investing in the stock market is not a zero-sum game, as evidenced by the positive median annualized return (red dotted line). In the long run, equity returns come from companies’ ability to grow their earnings, not from other investors’ misfortune.

Second, while gambling remains just as uncertain no matter how long you “play”, the opposite occurs within equity markets, as evidenced by the narrowing range of outcomes over time (grey area). The longer one “plays” (i.e. remains invested), the greater the chances are of converging towards the premium investors earn for bearing equity risk.

It depends. But since 1980, you would have been better off investing the full amount right away 86% of the time, while the decision to split the investment evenly over twelve months would have cost an average of 3.9% in lost returns. This simple study assumes a portfolio* evenly balanced between Canadian bonds and global equities.

 Of course, no one wants to put money to work right before a market correction, this myth being a prime example of one of the most well documented behavioural biases in finance: loss aversion.

Yet, think of it this way. Would you invest in a strategy that loses 8 times out of 10 and by an average of 3.9%? After all, these are the historical properties of dollar cost averaging.

While predominantly investing in domestic equities might seem sufficient and feel comforting, such a portfolio could, in fact, be just the opposite. Do not confuse familiarity with safety. For  instance, Canada’s stock market’s high concentration in some of the most cyclical sectors and its relative lack of growth-oriented companies poses a risk that can result in unpleasant surprises if left undiversified.

The good news is that there are plenty of opportunities abroad to complement for such risks. After all, Canadian stocks only represent 3% of the global equity investment universe... a far cry from the ~45% they account for in Canadians’ portfolios*. Home bias indeed!

It is true that the most turbulent periods for markets are generally concomitant with recessions. As such, those with eyes riveted on daily stock exchange prices are very likely to experience fear in times of economic downturn.

However, if we step back from market fluctuations and look, rather, at the historical performance of a basic balanced portfolio* during the last six recessions, we see that the average return was actually zero. Not something to celebrate, but far from the financial catastrophe many seem to believe –especially when we consider returns in the previous and following years. What’s more, let’s not forget that recessions are relatively rare events, covering only 17% of the last 50 years.

Therefore, it is not the recession that investors should fear, but fear itself… or rather the risk of materializing heavy losses, when in the grip of emotion, at an untimely moment.

That depends on what your investment objectives are.

GICs are indeed among the safest investment vehicles available. However, their returns, while guaranteed, generally fail to cover inflation, leaving their holders at risk of seeing their purchasing power decline over time.

It should be specified that this observation reflects the low interest rate environment prevailing over the past several years. For instance, although a 1-year GICs provided income above inflation in the 1990s, this has not been the case since 2009.

Ultimately, the selection of an investment vehicle depends on risk tolerance - GICs may therefore be the right choice for some. However, a key risk for investors whose investment horizon is measured in years may not be the short-term volatility of other assets, but rather the potential erosion of their purchasing power over the long run.

Contact us

Get contact information for our team members and find out where our offices are.